LEADERSHIP

Oz miners flunk indigenous relations

A STUDY which reviewed 53 of the top 200 Australia-listed resources companies found only one - a ...

Justin Niessner

This article is 12 years old. Images might not display.

Rio Tinto emerged as the only company to engage in the United Nations-enshrined principle of "free, prior and informed consent" regarding indigenous peoples and local communities affected by resource operations.

The study, by social development organisation Oxfam Australia, found that the vast majority of Australian resource companies did not have policies in place to consider indigenous rights, including the right to participate in decisions that affect the people, their land and natural resources.

According to Oxfam, only 14 of the reviewed resources companies have published a commitment to uphold human rights throughout their operations despite two-thirds of alleged human rights abuses being attributed to the extractives sector.

Oxfam chief executive Helen Szoke acknowledged that some miners were improving their disclosure and engagement policies but said the report revealed much more work was needed.

"This is a critical issue for the Australian mining industry," Szoke said.

"Australian companies are not only trying to access minerals on indigenous peoples' land here in Australia but are increasingly venturing overseas to do the same.

"Without the consent of affected people, mining companies will find it more and more difficult to access land for mine development and operation.

"Projects risk being delayed or shut down if communities directly affected are not involved in decision-making, do not give their consent, or are denied the opportunity to share in the benefits from these projects."

Investor research group Corporate Analysis Enhanced Responsibility worked with Oxfam in development of the report and said companies needed to understand the potential legal, reputational and financial risks of attempting to operate without this consent.

"They also increasingly run the risk of losing investor support since investors know that without consent, projects may be delayed or disrupted, adding unforeseen costs," CAER chief executive Duncan Patterson said.

"Investors are becoming savvy when deciding where to put their money.

"Key human rights principles such as the right of indigenous peoples to consent to the use of their land will play a greater role in where they choose to invest."

Oxfam said environmental degradation caused by mining had devastating effects on indigenous peoples' ability to feed themselves, drink clean water, farm and fish.

Other issues were identified as malnutrition, declining social cohesion and destruction of places of cultural and spiritual significance.

Expert-led Insights reports and Analytics tools built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Risk, Projects, ESG, Leadership, and Investor Sentiment.

Expert-led Insights reports and Analytics tools built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Risk, Projects, ESG, Leadership, and Investor Sentiment.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Leadership Insights 2025

Leadership Insights reveals key trends in priority mining issues through interviews with 15+ top mining company executives and an industrywide survey.

editions

Mining IQ Risk Analytics

Risk Analytics offers interactive access to World Risk Insight data, allowing you to customise risk views, benchmark jurisdictions, explore data behind scores and read expert commentary to guide your decision-making.

editions

Project Pipeline Index 2025

View our 50 top mining projects, handpicked using a unique, objective selection process from an expanded database of 600+ global assets.